KING HENRY II. DESCRIBED BY GIRALDUS CAMBRENSIS [Gerald of Wales],
Who accompanied him (as he afterwards did King John) into Ireland, A.D. 1172.
Henry II., king of England, was of a very good colour, but somewhat red; his head great and round, his eyes were fiery, red, and grim, and his face very high coloured; his voice or speech was shaking, quivering, or trembling; his neck short, his breast broad and big; strong armed; his body was gross, and his belly somewhat big, which came to him rather by nature than by any gloss feeding or surfeiting; for his diet was very temperate, and to say the truth, thought to be more spare than comely, or for the state of a prince; and yet to abate his grossness, and to remedy this fault of nature, he did, as it were, punish his body with continual exercise, and keep a continual war with himself. For in the times of his wars, which were for the most part continual to him, he had little or no rest at all; and in times of peace he would not grant unto himself any peace at all, nor take any rest: for then did he give himself wholly unto hunting; and to follow the same, he would very early every morning be on horseback, and then go into the woods, sometimes into the forests, and sometimes into the hills and fields, and so would he spend the whole day until night. In the evening when he came home, he would never, or very seldom, sit either before or after supper; for though he were never so weary, yet still would he be walking and going. And, forasmuch as it is very profitable for every man in his lifetime that he do not take too much of any one thing, for medicine itself, which is appointed for man's help and remedy, is not absolutely perfect and good to be always used, even so it befell and happened to this prince; for, partly by his excessive travels, and partly by divers bruises in his body, his legs and feet were swollen and sore. And, though he had no disease at all, yet age itself was a breaking sufficient unto him. He was of a reasonable stature, which happened to none of his sons; for his two eldest sons were somewhat higher, and his two younger: were somewhat lower and less than he was. If he were in a good mood, and not angry, then would he be very o and eloquent: he was also (which was a thing very rare in those days) very well learned; he was also very affable, gentle, and courteous; and besides, so pitiful, that when he had overcome his enemy, yet would he be overcome with pity towards him. In war he was most valiant, and in peace he was as provident and circumspect. And in the wars, mistrusting and doubting of the end and event thereof, he would (as Terence writeth) try all the ways and means he could devise, rather than wage the battle. If he lost any of his men in the fight, he would marvellously lament his death, and seem to pity him more being dead, than he did regard or account of him being alive; more bewailing the dead, than favouring the living. In times of distress no man was more courteous; and when all things were safe, ao man more cruel. Against the stubborn and unruly, no man more sharp, yet to the humble no man more gentle; hard towards his own men and household, but liberal to strangers; bountiful abroad, but sparing at home; whom he once hated, he would never or very hardly love; and whom he once loved, he would not lightly be out with him, or forsake him. He had great pleasure and delight in hawking and hunting:—would to God he had been as well bent and disposed unto good devotion to*. It was said, that after the displeasure frown between the king and his sons, by the means and through the enticing of the queen their mother, he never was accounted to keep his word and promise, but, without any regard or care, was a common breaker thereof. And true it is, that, of a certain natural disposition, he was light and inconstant of his word; and if the matter were brought to a narrow strait or pinch, he would not stick rather to cover his word, than to deny his deed. And for this cause, in all his doings, he was very provident and circumspect, and a very upright and severe minister of justice, although he did therein grieve and make his friends to smart. His answers, for the most part, were perverse and froward. And, albeit, for profit and lucre all things are set to sale, and do bring great gains, as well to the clergy as the laity, yet they are no better to a man's heirs and executors, than were the riches of Gehasi [servant of the prophet Elisha], whose greedy doings turned himself to utter ruin and destruction. He was a great peace-maker, and careful keeper thereof himself; a liberal almsgiver, and a special benefactor to the Holy Land; he loved humility, abhorred pride,
* Giraldus here alludes to his quarrel with Thomas a Becket.
and much oppressed his nobility. The hungry he refreshed, the rich he regarded not. The humble he would exalt, but the mighty, he disdained. He usurped much upon the holy church; and of a certain kind of zeal, but not according to knowledge, he did intermingle and enjoin profane with holy things; for why? He would be all in all himself. He was the child of the holy mother church, and by her advanced to the sceptre of his kingdom; and yet he either dissembled or utterly forgot the same; for he was slack always in coming to the church unto the divine service, and at the time thereof he would be busied and occupied rather with councils and in conference about the affairs of his commonwealth, than in devotion and prayer. The livelihoods belonging to any spiritual pro. motion, he would, in time of their vacation, confiscate to his own treasury, and assume that to himself which was due unto Christ When any new troubles or wars did grow. or come upon him, then would he lavish and pour out all that ever he had in store or treasury, and liberally bestow that upon a soldier, which ought to have been given unto the priest. He had a very prudent and forecasting wit, and thereby foreseeing what things might or were like to ensue, he would accordingly order or dispose either for the performance or for the prevention thereof; notwithstanding which, many times the event happened to the con trary, and he was disappointed of his expectation: and commonly there happened no ill unto him, but he would foretell there. of to his friends and familiars. He was a marvellous natural father to his children, and loved them tenderly in their childhood and young years; but they being grown to some age and ripeness, he was as a father-in-law, and could scarcely brook any of them. And, notwithstanding they were very handsome, comely, and noble gentlemen, yet, whether it were that he would not have them prosper too fast, or whether they had evil deserved of him, he hated them; and it was full much against his will that they should be his successors, or heirs to any part of his inheritance. And such is the prosperity of man, that as it cannot be perpetual, no more can it be perfect and assured: for why?—such was the secret malice of fortune against this king, that where he should have received much comfort, there had he most sorrow; where quietness and safety —there unquietness and peril; where peace —there enmity; where courtesy—there ingratitude; where rest—there trouble. And whether this happened by the means of their marriages, or for the punishment of the father's sins, certain it is, there was no good agreement, neither between the father and the sons, nor yet among the sons themselves. But at length, when all his enemies and the disturbers of the common peace were suppressed, and his brethren, his sons, and all others his adversaries, as well at home as abroad, were reconciled; then all things happened and befell unto him (though it were long first) after and according to his own will and mind. And would to God he had likewise reconciled himself unto God, and by amendment of his life, had in the end also procured his favour and mercy! Besides this, which I had almost forgotten, he was of such a memory, that if he had seen and known a man, he would not forget him: neither yet whatsoever he had heard, would he be unmindful thereof. And hereof was it, that he had so ready a memory of histories which he had read, and a knowledge and a manner of experience in all things. To conclude, if he had been chosen of God, and been obsequious and careful to live in his fear and after his laws, he had excelled all the princes of the world; for in the gifts of nature, no one man was to be compared unto him.”
Extracted from
The History Of The Principal Transactions Of The Irish Parliament, ... From The Year 1634 To 1666: In Two Volumes. Cadell. 1792. pp. 33–. and also William Hone (1878). The Table Book, of Daily Recreation and Information: Concerning Remarkable Men, Manners, Times, Seasons, Solemnities, Merry-makings, Antiquities and Novelties, Forming a Complete History of the Year. Tegg. pp. 491–.
Tuesday, 24 July 2018
Sunday, 8 July 2018
Becket's Mission to the King of France
References
J. A. Giles (1846). The Life and Letters of Thomas À Becket: Now First Gathered from the Contemporary Historians. Whittaker. pp. 72–.
https://archive.org/stream/lifeandletterst02gilegoog#page/n108/mode/1up
CHAPTER VIII. p. 72-79 OF THE CHANCELLOR's EMBASSY TO THE FRENCH KING.
James Craigie Robertson (1859). Becket, archbishop of Canterbury: A biography. Chancellor Becket's Embassy to King of France 1159: J. Murray. pp. 31–.
John Morris (1859). The Life and Martyrdom of Saint Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury, Etc. Longman, Brown. pp. 26–.
Gourde, Leo T., "An Annotated Translation of the Life of St. Thomas Becket by William Fitzstephen" (1943). Master's Theses. Paper 622. p.38-
http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/622
James Craigie Robertson (15 November 2012). Materials for the History of Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury (Canonized by Pope Alexander III, AD 1173). Volume III. Cambridge University Press. pp. 29–. ISBN 978-1-108-04927-6.
CHAPTER VIII. p. 72-79 OF THE CHANCELLOR's EMBASSY TO THE FRENCH KING.
James Craigie Robertson (1859). Becket, archbishop of Canterbury: A biography. Chancellor Becket's Embassy to King of France 1159: J. Murray. pp. 31–.
John Morris (1859). The Life and Martyrdom of Saint Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury, Etc. Longman, Brown. pp. 26–.
Gourde, Leo T., "An Annotated Translation of the Life of St. Thomas Becket by William Fitzstephen" (1943). Master's Theses. Paper 622. p.38-
http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/622
James Craigie Robertson (15 November 2012). Materials for the History of Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury (Canonized by Pope Alexander III, AD 1173). Volume III. Cambridge University Press. pp. 29–. ISBN 978-1-108-04927-6.