Monday, 30 March 2015

Becket's Attempt To Consult With The Pope, Summer 1164

In the summer of 1164 Becket tried twice to sneak across the English Channel to visit the Pope who was in exile in Sens to discuss the Constitutions of Clarendon. Both attempts to cross the English Channel ended in failure.

Story as related by Edward Grim

Edward Grim, MTB 2. 389-90.


Story of one attempt according to Alan of Tewkesbury

Biala, Mary De Chantal, "Annotated Translation of the Life of Saint Thomas, Archbishop of Canterbury By John of Salisbury and Alan of Tewkesbury" (1945). Master's Theses. Paper 51. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/51  p. 41-2


https://archive.org/stream/materialsforhist02robe#page/325/mode/1up

Therefore the Archbishop in fear turned to flight and came to his manor at Aldington. While the others were sleeping, he secretly started out with only two companions and having found a boat, he embarked on the sea. Worn by adverse wind for a long time, he returned ashore barely alive as day dawned. When his departure was discovered, his household and friends dispersed.
...
The Archbishop called some of the monks to the Church of Canterbury, and explained to them what happened to him and how it was the will of God that he should not yet leave. He rested after a light refreshment. In the morning the officials by the order of the king rushed in order that in the Archbishop's absence they might confiscate all, but seeing and hearing him, they were confused into silence by his presence.

As related by Garnier [Guernes de Pont-Sainte-Maxence]

E pur ceo que Deus aime mult mercial justise
E plus misericorde k'il ne fet sacrifise,
A li bons arceveske cele bataille emprise
Pur les clers maintenir e pur sa mere iglise.
Bien veit que laie mein n'i devreit estre mise. - 1355

Quant l'arceveske veit ne purra conquester
L'amur al rei, kil het cume del chief colper
(Car cu'il het une feitz, nel voldra puis amer),
Sun eire apareilla, si se mist en la mer.
Dejuste Rumenel comencent a sigler. 1360

Quant furent luinz en mer e empeinz e siglé,
Li notunier k'i ierent unt ensemble parlé ;
E Adam de Cherringes dient k'il sunt desvé,
Ke l'enemi le rei unt del païs geté ;
E il e lur lignage erent desherité. 1365

A l'arceveske vunt tut ensemble parler :
Dient li k'il ne poent cuntre le vent sigler,
Ne nuls hum a cel vent ne purreit passer mer.
"Quant nus estuet, fet il, pur oré returner,
Pernez port la u Deus le vus voldra doner. " 1370

L'arceveske l'a puis suvent issi cunté,
E a sun escïent sunt pur ceo returné.




272
When the archbishop saw that he could not regain the friendship of the king of which hate was principally to blame (because whatever he hated once he could never love again), he made ready for his journey: thus he put to sea near Romney; it was from here he set sail. 1360

273
When they were far out to sea buffeted by a gale and under sail,  the sailors who were there came together to speak with one another; and they said to Adam de Charing [master of the ship?] that they were enraged that they would be ejected from the country as enemies of the king, and that both they and their lineage [family] would be disinherited. 1365

274
Together they came to speak with the archbishop. They said to him they could not sail against the wind, that no one in this gale could cross the sea.  <<Do whatever is necessary for us;>> he said, << when a favourable wind returns, make for whatever port God is willing to give you.>> 1370

275
The archbishop afterwards often told this story like this. Indeed, to his mind, they had returned for these reasons: God had not yet made him ready to undergo the crossing; nor had he yet engaged on the field of battle in close quarters [either in a real or mock battle in the lists of a tournament], nor had the great skirmish which God was to throw him into yet taken place. 1375

276

But when the king heard that he [Becket] must have crossed [over the Channel] he was very much upset by it, and was very anxious, because he was very afraid for this reason, he [the king] feared that he [Becket] would go to  the Pope and that the whole of the kingdom would be placed under an interdict. 1380



The Archbishop was aware that he could not regain the affection of the King. Henry hated Thomas to the point of wanting to cut off his head, (because his hate was such that once made, he would never again want to love). And so Thomas prepared to put to sea, sailing from Romney. When they had sailed far from the shore, the sailors were overheard talking together saying that they had spoken to Adam of Charing, who had said they had lost their reason wanting to bear the king's enemy out of the country and that their line of descendants would be disinherited. They all went up to the Archbishop and said to him  that they could not sail against the wind: no one could pass across the sea against the wind. "Take the port," he [Becket] said, "that which God gives to you." The archbishop often spoke of this later in these terms; in so far as we knew they had put back because of the wind

Hutton (1899)
...

Becket at home attempted to see Henry at Woodstock
in vain. Then, going to his manor of Aldington, he
made two attempts to escape, from Romney. The
first time the wind drove him back ; the second the
sailors put back, recognising him and dreading the
king's wrath, and he returned to Canterbury.
One of his servants was audaciously going to sleep
in the archbishop's own chamber. After supper he
began to think sadly of his master's evil case ; then
when night was half over he wished to sleep and told
a boy to go and shut the outer door. There on the
doorstep sat the archbishop himself alone. The lad
in terror fled in, thinking he had seen a vision, but the
clerk would not believe him and went to see for himself.
There was the archbishop, who then entered
the house, and, sending for some of the monks, told
them of what had happened to him, and so after a
brief supper went to bed. Next morning came some
of the king's men to seize his goods, but when they
saw him they retired in silent confusion. Henry,
indeed, knew of his attempt at flight, and, in another
meeting at Woodstock, half laughingly reproached
him for it. He did not give him all the ceremony that
was the due of the primate of all England. He asked
him whether he did not think the kingdom big enough
to hold them both. 

...

References

John Allen Giles (1846). The Life and Letters of Thomas À Becket: Now First Gathered from the Contemporary Historians. Whittaker and Company. pp. 228–.

F. R. H. Du Boulay (1966). The lordship of Canterbury: an essay on medieval society. Nelson. page 201-3



Frank Barlow (1990). Thomas Becket. University of California Press. pp. 106-. ISBN 978-0-520-07175-9.

Frank Barlow (1990). Thomas Becket. University of California Press. pp. 322–. ISBN 978-0-520-07175-9.

John Allen Giles (1846). The Life and Letters of Thomas À Becket: Now First Gathered from the Contemporary Historians. Whittaker and Company. pp. 228–.

Gourde, Leo T., "An Annotated Translation of the Life of St. Thomas Becket by William Fitzstephen" Volume 1 (1943).
Master's Theses. Paper 622. pp. 63-4

Fisher, M. Ann Kathleen, "An Annotated Translation of the Life of St. Thomas Becket By Herbert Bosham (Part Two)" (1947).
Master's Theses. Paper 171.
http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/171
Book 3 Chapter 31 p. 87-92

Aldington manor, the Archbishop of Canterbury's enormous demesne manor, in 1164 it was by the sea coast, and very near to the Roman haven, Portus Limanus.

Near Romney Marsh, In medieval times the marsh was sea.  New Romney [and Lydd] was the principal Cinque port. It was once a port of considerable importance at the mouth of the river Rother until it became blocked in 1287.


William Holloway (1849). The History of Romney Marsh ... J.R. Smith. pp. 66–.

Edward Hasted, 'Parishes: Aldington', in The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent: Volume 8 (Canterbury, 1799), pp. 314-327
Edward Hasted, 'Romney Marsh', in The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent: Volume 8 (Canterbury, 1799), pp. 465-473

Edward Hasted, 'The town and port of New Romney', in The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent: Volume 8 (Canterbury, 1799), pp. 446-464

 Aldington, Kent - Wikipedia

Aldington manor, the Archbishop of Canterbury's enormous demesne manor, in 1164 it was by the sea coast, and very near to the Roman haven, Portus Limanus.

Near Romney Marsh, In medieval times the marsh was sea.  New Romney [and Lydd] was the principal Cinque port. It was once a port of considerable importance at the mouth of the river Rother until it became blocked in 1287.


William Holloway (1849). The History of Romney Marsh ... J.R. Smith. pp. 66–.


Edward Hasted, 'Parishes: Aldington', in The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent: Volume 8 (Canterbury, 1799), pp. 314-327
Edward Hasted, 'Romney Marsh', in The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent: Volume 8 (Canterbury, 1799), pp. 465-473

Edward Hasted, 'The town and port of New Romney', in The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent: Volume 8 (Canterbury, 1799), pp. 446-464


Edward Grim, MTB 2. 389-90.

Michael Staunton (2001). The Lives of Thomas Becket. 22. Thomas attempts to flee (August- September 1164): Manchester University Press. pp. 99–100. ISBN 978-0-7190-5455-6.



Archaeologia Cantiana. Kent Archaeological Society. 1954. p. 92-
Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 66  1953 

Edward Hasted (1798). The History and Topographical Survey of the County of Kent. W. Bristow. pp. 432–.
La vie de Saint Thomas le martyr


Adam of Charing

Adam of Charing is often reported in various biographies of Becket to be the skipper of one of the ships which transported Becket to the continent in the summer of 1164. I disagree with this. There is no substantive evidence confirming that he was the skipper or boat owner on this or any other occasion.. It is true that he was a well-known and leading citizen of Canterbury, possibly a lawyer, merchant or a business man, that later he had a significant role in the king's programme for the sequestering the property of the church of Canterbury after Becket had fled into exile after the Council of Northampton, and for which he is excommunicated by Becket at Vézelay. It could be true that he did tell those sailors who did try to transport Becket across the Channel that they had been very foolish,  risking everything by doing so, though Becket was not strictly an outlaw at this point in the proceedings, but was breaking the law as stated in the Constitutions of Clarendon by not obtaining the king's permission for this journey first. Adam of Charing's comment to these sailors might have been at a much later date, long after the events described here, his having experienced having to pay a huge sum of money in three installments into the king's treasury, as recorded in the pipe rolls for the years 1165, 1166 and 1167. We do not know the reason why he had to make these payments. They are simply described as an amercement.or fine. We are not told what the fine was for: smuggling, or some other crime. It is often presumed that he was fined for the attempt  to transport Becket to France. However there is no substantive evidence that this was what the fine was for. 



John of Salisbury Letter Ex Insperato

A highly hagiographic letter, Ex Inspirato means unexpectedly.

In this letter John narrates the story of the murder of  Becket. It is the earliest written account which describes Becket's murder as a martyrdom. In this letter he refers to Becket as "the confessor of Christ" and "Christ's champion" and constantly stresses just how pious and righteous he had been. By emphasizing this piety John attempts to confirm that this murder truly was a martyrdom. And in the letter John asks whether he should be added to the lists of martyrs who should be venerated, but clarifying that this ultimately was a decision which the Pope would have to have the last word upon.

In this letter John of Salisbury tries to explain that it was almost inevitable that Becket would suffer much for receiving martyrdom from the hand of God, that though the murder was motivated by the Devil it had all yet been ordained by God. Becket would have known this since his return to England from exile that he would gain martyrdom, that he had received a sign from heaven about this, a sign from God which had announced to him his death. 

...
that you know of the passion of the glorious martyr Thomas, And because I did not doubt  the
Archbishop of Canterbury, who glorifies not only his own Church but every province of Eng-
land by his many great miracles.

...
And so for one of your learning to instruct our humble selves as to whether it would be safe
to invoke him as a guardian of salvation among the lists of the martyrs in the solemnities of
Masses and in other public prayers without the authority of the Roman Pontiff, or whether we
are bound to offer supplication prayers for him whom God has glorified by so many signs of
miracles, just as we would for any other departed soul.

...

Latin Version

John (of Salisbury, Bishop of Chartres): Edited J. Giles (1848). Joannis Saresberiensis Postea Epizcopi Carnotensis Opera Omnia ... Apud J. H. Parker. pp. 251–. 

Translation 

O'Connor, John Francis, "An Annotated Translation of the Letters of John of Salisbury" (1947). Master's Theses. Paper 672.
http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/672
Page 88-98
Letter 307/304
John of Salisbury to Bishop John Belmeis of Poitiers

References

Paul Dalton; Dr. Charles Insley; Louise J. Wilkinson (2011). Cathedrals, Communities and Conflict in the Anglo-Norman World. Boydell Press. pp. 170–. ISBN 978-1-84383-620-9.

Frank Barlow (1990). Thomas Becket. University of California Press. pp. 2–. ISBN 978-0-520-07175-9.

Actes Du Colloque International de Sedieres. Editions Beauchesne. pp. 78–.

Het Martelaarschap van Thomas Becket en Karel de Goede
by Sjoukje Telleman
Open Access version via Utrecht University Repository

William Duiker; Jackson Spielvogel (2012). World History, Volume I: To 1800. Murder in the Cathedral: Cengage Learning. pp. 376–. ISBN 1-133-71423-4.

H G Koenigsberger (2014). Medieval Europe 400 - 1500. Routledge. pp. 171–. ISBN 978-1-317-87089-0. 

What Became of the Bones of St Thomas?. CUP Archive. pp. 29–. 

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

Eleanor of Aquitaine

Eleanor of Aquitaine - Wikipedia

Aliénor d'Aquitaine (1122-1204) - Biographie


duché d'Aquitaine - Traduction anglaise – Linguee

Agnes Strickland (1841). Matilda of Flanders. Eleanora of Aquitaine. Eleanora of Aquitaine: Lea & Blanchard. pp. 245–.


Marion Meade (2002). Eleanor of Aquitaine: A Biography. Phoenix. ISBN 978-1-84212-618-9.

Amy Kelly (1978). Eleanor of Aquitaine and the Four Kings. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-24254-8.

Amy Kelly (1978). Eleanor of Aquitaine and the Four Kings. Harvard University Press.   ISBN 978-0-674-24254-8.

Bonnie Wheeler; John C. Parsons (2003). Eleanor of Aquitaine: Lord and Lady. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-29582-0.

David Hilliam (2005). Eleanor of Aquitaine: The Richest Queen in Medieval Europe. The Rosen Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-4042-0162-0.

Alison Weir (2012). Eleanor of Aquitaine: A Life. Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-307-83185-9.

Nancy Plain (2005). Eleanor of Aquitaine and the High Middle Ages. Marshall Cavendish. ISBN 978-0-7614-1834-4.

William W. Kibler (1976). Eleanor of Aquitaine, patron and politician. University of Texas Press. ISBN 978-0-292-72014-5.



Ffiona Swabey (2004). Eleanor of Aquitaine, Courtly Love, and the Troubadours. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 29–. ISBN 978-0-313-32523-6.

Rachel A. Koestler-Grack (2005). Eleanor of Aquitaine: Heroine of the Middle Ages. Infobase Publishing. pp. 1–. ISBN 978-1-4381-0416-4.

William W. Kibler (2014). Eleanor of Aquitaine: Patron and Politician. University of Texas Press. ISBN 978-1-4773-0024-4.

Ralph V. Turner (16 June 2009). Eleanor of Aquitaine: Queen of France, Queen of England. Yale University Press. pp. 1–. ISBN 978-0-300-15989-9.

Alison Weir (2011). The Captive Queen and Eleanor of Aquitaine. Random House. ISBN 978-1-4464-5773-3.

Polly Schoyer Brooks (1999). Queen Eleanor: Independent Spirit of the Medieval World. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. ISBN 0-395-98139-5.

Life Magazine 26 May 1947. LIFE. Time Inc. pp. 73–. ISSN 00243019.

Katy Schiel (2003). Monarchy: A Primary Source Analysis. The Rosen Publishing Group. pp. 30–. ISBN 978-0-8239-4520-7.


Eyre Evans Crowe (1858). The History of France. Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, and Roberts. pp. 140–.



New Catholic World. Paulist Fathers. 1871. pp. 164–.

France_12thC.jpg (JPEG Image, 968 × 1541 pixels)

Douglas Boyd (2011). April Queen: Eleanor of Aquitaine. History Press Limited. ISBN 978-0-7524-7304-8.

Amy Ruth Kelly (1978). Eleanor of Aquitaine and the Four Kings. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-24254-8.

Curtis Howe Walker (1950). Eleanor of Aquitaine. University of North Carolina Press.

Rachel A. Koestler-Grack (2005). Eleanor of Aquitaine: Heroine of the Middle Ages. Infobase Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4381-0416-4.

Colette Bowie (2014). The Daughters of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine: A Comparative Study of Twelfth-Century Royal Women. Brepols Publishers. ISBN 978-2-503-54971-2.

Lejeune, R. (1958). Rôle littéraire de la famille d'Aliénor d'Aquitaine. Cahiers de civilisation médiévale, 1(3), 319-337.

 

Thursday, 19 March 2015

Henry II's Dealings with the Holy Roman Empire, 1165-6

During Lent, in 1165, Henry crossed over the sea from England to Normandy, On April 11th he met with Louis VII king of France at Gisors. Afterwards, on 15th April, at Rouen, he received a delegation from Frederick Barbarossa, the Holy Roman Emperor, led by Rainald von Dassell, archbishop-elect of Cologne and chancellor of Italy. The principal purpose of this mission was to ask for the hands in marriage of two of King Henry's daughters, Eleanor to the Friederich’s eldest son, also Friederich, and Mathilda, as the spouse for Frederick's relative, Henry the Lion, of Saxony.  During the negotiations ecclesiastical matters were also brought up, as Pope Alexander's recent imperfect handling of Henry over the Constitutions of Clarendon and Becket's subsequent flight into exile was topmost in Henry's mind. Rainald saw this as a clear opportunity to win over Henry to the Emperor's side. Some say Henry made vague promises in this direction. Whatever, Henry and the English Church were too much in the camp of Pope Alexander's.

After the meeting in Normandy the Germans followed Henry back across the sea to England, where, although received with due formal honours, they were treated coldly by the English court because of their association with the imperial antipope. Several "undiplomatic" incidents occurred, including the ritual cleansing of altars where they had celebrated mass. and the refusal by one of king Henry's senior barons, the Earl of Leicester, chief justiciar of the kingdom, to give Rainald the kiss of peace. The imperial mission returned back to Germany together with two of King Henry's most trusted envoys and representatives, John of Oxford and Richard of Ilchester. After he got back Rainald was full of boasts that he had won over Henry to the antipapal cause, and who would bring with him more than fifty bishops from his vast domains

At Whitsuntide, May 24th 1165 a grand Imperial Diet was summoned by Frederick Barbarossa to Wurzburg, There Rainald of Cologne proposed that Frederick should swear publicly on oath that he would never give recognition to Alexander as Pope, but that he would only recognise, Paschal III [Guy of Crema, the second antipope] as Pope. Frederick agreed to do this and swore this on behalf of both himself and his successors The same oath was also exacted from Frederick's prelates and the princes of his empire. Included in this oath, according to documents published by Frederick, and also in a letter sent to one of Becket’s agents, it was said that the English envoys John of Oxford and Richard of Ilchester had also subscribed their master’s name to this oath, although Henry afterwards claimed he was never party to or bound by his envoys actions, and he never personally issued an official denial, thought it seems that he did force Rotrou, archbishop of Rouen to send a letter to Pope Alexander's curia that he had not given any kind of oath of support to the emperor's antipope Paschal III.

The oath given by Henry's legates to Frederick at the Diet of Wurzburg 1165 was recorded thus

Ad hæc honorabiles Legati illustris amici nostri Henrici , gloriosi Anglorum Regis, ad nos ab ipso transmissi , in totius Curia: nostra præsentia super sanctorum Reliquias ex parte Regis Angliæ publice juraverunt nobis , quod Rex ipfe cum toto Regno suo in parte nostra fideliter stabit: Dominum Paschalem , quem nos tenemos, nobiscum semper tenebit .

At these words the most illustrious ambassadors of our friend of Henry, the glorious King of the English, sent to us by him, before and in the presence of the whole court did publicly swear to us upon the relics of the saints that the King of England, the King himself, on his part, would faithfully, and together with the whole of his kingdom that he shall stand with the Lord Paschal, and would hold to this with us. ...

Henry's denial is recorded in


Materials for the History of Thomas Becket, Volume 5 p. 194  MTB Epistola 101 July 1st 1165

In the sequel Richard of Ilchester does not seem to have been expressly charged with having sworn to recognise Paschal. John of Oxford, however, was so charged again and again, and Becket excommunicated him at Vezelay on Whitsunday 1166 on this ground as well as on another. It is true that Richard of Ilchester was excommunicated among several other persons on the same day, but we are not told that this was the specific charge laid against him. John of Oxford himself soon afterwards got released  by the pope and was restored to his deanery at Salisbury, having explained the Wurzburg incident and having sworn that he had done nothing to the injury of the Church or of Alexander. One has to conclude, then, that the oath taken at Wurzburg was capable of two interpretations, and that the emperor was deceived as to the pledge which he supposed was being made on behalf of the English king.

The original plan to match a daughter of Henry II with the eldest son of Frederick I, Holy Roman Emperor, was abandoned as this son died in childhood.  Matilda, however, left England in September 1167 to proceed with the arranged marriage to Henry the Lion of Saxony.

References

Elfinspell: 1166 A.D., Henry II's Letter to the Archbishop of Cologne, from King's Letters, edited by Robert Steel, Richard de Lucy, Saint Thomas, Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury, martyr, Norman England History, Primary Source, English translation

John Allen Giles (1846). The Life and Letters of Thomas À Becket: Now First Gathered from the Contemporary Historians. Letter 29 King Henry to Reginald, archbishop of Cologne: Whittaker and Company. pp. 316–.

Materials for the history of Thomas Becket Volume V, p. 428-9
Epistola 113 Henry king of England to Reginald schismatic archbishop of Cologne Summer 1166? [Sent after the excommunications of Vezelay on June 12, 1166]

Diu desideravi justam habere occasionem recedendi a papa Alexandro et a perfidis cardinalibus ejus, qui proditorem meum Thomam, Cantuariensem archiepiscopum, contra me manutenere praesumunt ; unde cum consilio baronum meorum et cleri, magnos viros de regno meo, archiepiscopum scilicet Eboracensem, episcopum Londoniensem, archidiaconum Pictavensem, Richardum de Luci, Johannem de Oxonia, Romam missurus sum, qui publice denuntiabunt, et manifesto ex parte mea et totius regni Angliae et omnium aliarum terrarum quas habeo proponent papa Alexandro et cardinalibus ejus, ne ulterius proditorem meum manuteneant sed ita liberent me ab eo, ut alium possim cum consilio cleri instituere in ecclesia Cantuari- ensi ; denuntiabimt etiam, quod quicquid Thomas fecit in irritum revocent. Hoc etiam postulabunt, ut coram eis papa jurari faciat publice, quod ipse et successores sui et mihi et omnibus meis regias consuetudines Henrici regis avi mei inconcussas et inviolatas, quantum ad se, in perpetuum conservabunt. Quod si forte alicui petitionum mearum contradicere voluerint, neque ego, neque barones mei, nequexslerus meus aliquam eia ulterius servabimus obedientiam, immo ipsum papam et omnes suos manif este impugnabimus, et quicumque in terra mea inventiLs fuerit, qui papa; post hsec adhaerere voluerit, expelletur a regno. Ea propter rogamus voa, ut carissimum amicum, quatenus fratrem Ernaldum Hospitaliarium, omni occasione remota, cito ad nos mittatis, qui ex parte imperatoris et vestra prasdictis nuntiis meis ducatum prsebeat in eundo^ per terram imperatoris; Valete.

I have long wished to have a just cause for leaving pope Alexander and his perfidious cardinals, who presume to support my traitor, Thomas, formerly archbishop of Canterbury, in his rebellion against me. Wherefore, by the counsel of my barons, I mean to send to Rome the archbishop of York, the bishop of London, and the archdeacon of Poitou, John of Oxford, and Richard de Lucy, to warn the pope from myself and my whole kingdom, no longer to support the cause of my traitor, but to release me from him altogether, and let me have another archbishop of Canterbury in his place. They are also required to revoke all that he has done in this matter, and to make a public decree that the pope, for himself and his successors for ever, shall ratify the constitutions of Henry my grandfather; and if they do not consent to this request, I and my barons and all my clergy will obey him no longer, but will do all we can against him, and any of his party who are found in my dominions shall be expelled. I therefore pray you, as a friend whom I value, to send 12 to us without delay brother Arnold, or brother Ralph the Hospitaller, that they may afford safe conduct to my ambassadors aforesaid through the emperor’s dominions, both in going and returning


Concilia Germaniæ, quæ celsissimi principis Joannis Mauritii, archi-episcopi Pragensis. Curia Wirzenburgensis Pentecost 1165: typo viduæ Joan. Wilhelmi Krakamp, et hæredum Christiani Simonis. 1760. pp. 394–.

Concilia Germaniæ, quæ celsissimi principis Joannis Mauritii, archi-episcopi Pragensis. typo viduæ Joan. Wilhelmi Krakamp, et hæredum Christiani Simonis. 1760. pp. 399–.

Jean Hardouin; Philippe Labbé; Gabriel Cossart (1714). Acta Conciliorum Et Epistolae Decretales, Ac Constitutiones Summorum Pontificum: Ab anno MLXXXVI. ad annum MCCXV. Conciliabulum Herbipolense Pentecosten: Typographia Regia.

Matthæi Parisiensis, monachi Sancti Albani, Chronica Majora Volume II 1067-1216 Henry Luard p. 239.
Baron George Lyttelton Lyttelton (1769). The history of the life of King Henry the Second, and of the age in which he lived: in five books ; to which is prefixed a history of the revolutions of England from the death of Edward the
Confessor to the birth of Henry the Second. Printed for J. Dodsley. pp. 106–.


Walter Ullmann (2003). A Short History of the Papacy in the Middle Ages. Routledge. pp. 126–. ISBN 978-1-134-41535-9. 

Johann Joseph Ignaz von Döllinger (1842). A History of the Church: Translated from the German of the Rev. J.J. Ig. Döllinger,. C. Dolman and T. Jomes. pp. 16–. 

Court, household and itinerary of King Henry II pp. 78-117

Böhmer, Johann F.: Regesta Imperii 4: Lothar III. und ältere Staufer 1125—1197 RI IV,2,2 n. 1475, Friedrich I., 1165 Mai 24, Würzburg - Regesta Imperii 

Frederick I biography - Holy Roman emperor Relations with Pope Alexander III. Encyclopedia Britannica

Rainald von Dassel – Wikipedia

Rainald of Dassel - Wikipedia


Joseph Patrick Huffman (2000). The Social Politics of Medieval Diplomacy: Anglo-German Relations (1066-1307). University of Michigan Press. pp. 64–. ISBN 0-472-02418-3.

W. L. Warren (1977). Henry II. University of California Press. pp. 493–96. ISBN 978-0-520-03494-5.

Richard Barber (2003). Henry Plantagenet. Boydell Press. pp. 121–8. ISBN 978-0-85115-993-5.

Diet of Wurzburg - Germany [1165] - Encyclopedia Britannica

Oxford, John of (DNB00) - Wikisource

The English Review. Francis and John Rivington. 1846. pp. 384–.

Baron George Lyttelton Lyttelton (1769). The history of the life of King Henry the Second, Printed for J. Dodsley. pp. 106–.

Richard Barber (2003). Henry Plantagenet. Boydell Press. pp. 122–. ISBN 978-0-85115-993-5.

Walter Ullmann (2003). A Short History of the Papacy in the Middle Ages. Routledge. pp. 126–. ISBN 978-1-134-41535-9.

C. W. Previté-Orton (1975). Cambridge Medieval History, Shorter: Volume 1, The Later Roman Empire to the Twelfth Century. CUP Archive. pp. 569–. ISBN 978-0-521-09976-9.

Anne A. Latowsky (2013). Emperor of the World: Charlemagne and the Construction of Imperial Authority, 800–1229. Cornell University Press. pp. 154–. ISBN 0-8014-6778-0.
Timothy Reuter The Papal Schism of 1159-1169 Oxford 1975

Leyser 1975 Frederick Barbarossa, Henry II and the Hand of St. James 
English Historical review 90, 1975 481-506
http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/content/XC/CCCLVI/481.extract

Frederick Barbarossa, Henry II and the Hand of St James
K. Leyser
The English Historical Review
Vol. 90, No. 356 (Jul., 1975), pp. 481-506
Published by: Oxford University Press
http://www.jstor.org/stable/566731

Knut Görich (2011). Friedrich Barbarossa: Eine Biographie. C.H.Beck. pp. 280–. ISBN 978-3-406-62149-9.

Die Überlieferung von Barbarossas Hoftag zu Würzburg im Jahr 1165 und der Becket-Streit, in: Stauferreich im Wandel, Hg. Stefan Weinfurter (Mittelalter-Forschung 9), Ostfildern 2002, S. 149-171
Hannah Vollrath: Lüge oder Fälschung?

Stefan Weinfurter (2002). Stauferreich im Wandel: Ordnungsvorstellungen und Politik in der Zeit Friedrich Barbarossas. Die Überlieferung von Barbarossas Hoftag zu Würzburg im Jahr 1165 und der Becket-Streit. Thorbecke. p. 149. ISBN 978-3-7995-4260-9.

Vollrath, Hannah: The kiss of peace. Peace Treaties and International Law in European History. From the Late Middle Ages, ed. Randall Lesaffer, Cambridge 2004, pp. 162-193

Randall Lesaffer (2004). Peace Treaties and International Law in European History: From the Late Middle Ages to World War One. Cambridge University Press. pp. 162–. ISBN 978-1-139-45378-3.


Vollrath, Hannah: The kiss of peace. Peace Treaties and International Law in Europe pp. 162-193.

Böhmer, Johann F.: Regesta Imperii 4: Lothar III. und ältere Staufer 1125—1197 

Materials for the History of Thomas Becket, Volume 5 p. 191-4
MTB 100 July 1st 1165 
Fredericus Imperator Cunctis Populis
[Diet of Wurzburg, 1165] 
https://archive.org/stream/materialsforhist05robe#page/191/mode/1up 
 
Materials for the History of Thomas Becket, Volume 5 p. 194
MTB 101 July 1st 1165 
Contradiction of the reports from Wurzburg
https://archive.org/stream/materialsforhist05robe#page/194/mode/1up

Materials  I p. 52
Materials, V, p. 182
Report of the Great Meeting at Wurzburg June 1165
Materials, V, p. 428
Letter King Henry to Rainald schismatic archbishop of Cologne, Spring 1166
telling Rainald that he had demanded that Pope Alexander should depose Becket, and had requested powers to appoint a replacement archbishop, and that if Alexander did not comply he would reject him and recognize Pascal in his place.


William Holden Hutton (1926). Thomas Becket. Cambridge University Press. pp. 130–. ISBN 978-1-107-66171-4.

William Holden Hutton (1910) Thomas Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury p. 126-

Matilda of England, Duchess of Saxony Antipope Victor IV (1159–1164) - Wikipedia

Horst Fuhrmann (1986). Germany in the High Middle Ages: C.1050-1200. Cambridge University Press. pp. 159–. ISBN 978-0-521-31980-5.


Walter Ullmann (2003). A Short History of the Papacy in the Middle Ages. Routledge. pp. 126–. ISBN 978-1-134-41535-9.

Pierre Chaplais; Michael Jones; Malcolm Vale (1989). England and Her Neighbours, 1066-1453: Essays in Honour of Pierre Chaplais. A&C Black. pp. 45–. ISBN 978-1-85285-014-2.

Peter D. Clarke; Anne J. Duggan (2013). Pope Alexander III (1159–81): The Art of Survival. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. pp. 85–. ISBN 978-1-4094-8305-2.

Tobias Weller (2004). Die Heiratspolitik des deutschen Hochadels im 12. Jahrhundert. Böhlau Verlag Köln Weimar. pp. 103–. ISBN 978-3-412-11104-5.


Jens Ahlers (1987). Die Welfen und die englischen Könige, 1165-1235. A. Lax. ISBN 978-3-7848-3502-0.

Joseph Patrick Huffman (2000).
The Social Politics of Medieval Diplomacy: Anglo-German Relations (1066-1307). University of Michigan Press. pp. 64–. ISBN 0-472-02418-3.

Elisabeth Van Houts (2015). Anglo-Norman Studies 37: Proceedings of the Battle Conference 2014.  Gesine Oppitz-Trotman: The Emperor's Robe: Thomas Becket and Angevin Political Culture Boydell & Brewer. pp. 205–. ISBN 978-1-78327-024-8.

I. S. Robinson (19 July 1990). The Papacy, 1073-1198: Continuity and Innovation. Cambridge University Press. pp. 485–. ISBN 978-0-521-31922-5.
Henry II wrote to Rainald: 'I have long desired a lawful opportunity for withdrawing from Pope Alexander and his treacherous cardinals, who presume to support that traitor Thomas, formerly archbishop of Canterbury, against me.'

Wilfred Lewis Warren (1977). Henry II. University of California Press. pp. 492–. ISBN 978-0-520-03494-5.

Dorothy Mary Owen; Michael J. Franklin; Christopher Harper-Bill (1995). Medieval Ecclesiastical Studies: In Honour of Dorothy M. Owen. Boydell & Brewer Ltd. pp. 86–. ISBN 978-0-85115-384-1.